Making it possible to do both tasks simultaneously without any issues. One for transferring files and the other for receiving. On the other hand, the 3.0 flash drive has two opposite one directional data path. This is because there is only one relay path for the data to be transmitted. In segue, you can only send or receive data to a 2.0 flash drive at a time and not do both.
“Undoubtedly, any 3.0 flash drive is faster than a 2.0 flash drive” To avoid this, you can always identify a USB 3.0 port for its blue coloured part while the USB 2.0 port is all black. Using the 2.0 USB flash drive with a 3.0 USB port may not quite work properly which is where the 3.0 flash drive is better because it is compatible with both 2.0 and 3.0 USB ports. More read: exFAT, FAT32 or NTFS: Which one should you use to format your USB Flash disk? You will have to use the flash drive with the right port to fully harness the potential. If it was a 2.0 port, the 3.0 flash drive will work with the speed of a 2.0 USB port. Some of the cheaper flash drives can store less. Another thing is, the USB port you use matters. USB flash drives are only limited by the cost of the storage space and the physical constraints of the drive. Furthermore, the 3.0 flash drive (USB 3.0 flash drive) is a more recent tech, hence, should have the same recent innards.Īt the end of the day, the 3.0 flash drive can be from just a few megabytes faster to like 30x faster depending on the 2.0 flash drive you are comparing it with. How much faster it is, is dependent on the flash memory inside. Undoubtedly, any 3.0 flash drive is faster than a 2.0 flash drive. However, the real question is what happens practically when we use either type of the flash drive.
0 kommentar(er)
